The Best Mobile App Development Frameworks: How to Choose

The best mobile app development framework is the one that gets you to your first paying customer fastest.

That's not the answer most framework guides give you. They'll rank React Native against Flutter against Swift, compare GitHub stars and benchmark scores, and leave you with a 3,000-word decision matrix that assumes you have six months and a computer science degree. Useful if you're a senior engineer choosing a tech stack for a funded startup. Less useful if you're a real estate agent who wants to charge clients $85/month for a property portal, or a med student building a CPR training app between classes.

Here's the thing: the framework debate is shifting underneath most people's feet. The fastest-growing group of app builders today aren't picking between Kotlin and Dart — they're skipping the framework decision entirely by using AI-powered platforms that handle it for them. A finance professional in Japan built AI tools that generated $34,000 in revenue without ever opening Xcode. That wasn't possible two years ago.

This guide covers the major mobile development frameworks — native, cross-platform, and AI-powered — and explains what each one actually requires from you in terms of skill, time, and money. But instead of ranking them by developer popularity or performance benchmarks, we're evaluating them against the questions that matter most to builders: Can I ship to the App Store? Can I accept payments on day one? Will the app hold up when real customers show up at midnight? And can I iterate without hiring a developer every time something breaks?

If you can code, this will help you pick the right framework for your stack and goals. If you can't — or you'd rather spend your time on customers instead of configuration files — you'll find out why the best framework might be the one you never have to think about.

What "Framework" Actually Means (and Why Most Guides Overcomplicate It)

A mobile app framework is the foundation your app is built on. It determines what platforms your app runs on, how it performs, what programming language you use, and what tools are available to help you build. Think of it like choosing between building a house from scratch with raw lumber, assembling one from a prefab kit, or describing what you want and having someone build it for you.

The options fall into three categories.

• Native frameworks mean building specifically for one platform. Swift and SwiftUI for iOS, Kotlin and Jetpack Compose for Android. You get maximum performance and full access to device features, but you're writing separate code for each platform. Two apps, two codebases, two sets of maintenance.
• Cross-platform frameworks like React Native and Flutter let you write one codebase that runs on both iOS and Android (and sometimes web). You save time on development, but you're still responsible for setting up production infrastructure yourself.
• AI-powered platforms take a fundamentally different approach. You describe what you want your app to do in plain English, and the platform generates the code, handles the infrastructure, and deploys the result. The framework becomes invisible — something the platform manages, not something you choose.

You'll also encounter hybrid frameworks like Ionic and Capacitor, which wrap web technologies in a native shell, and Progressive Web Apps (PWAs), which run in mobile browsers without App Store distribution. Both have legitimate use cases, but they're being rapidly eclipsed by cross-platform frameworks with better performance and AI-powered platforms with broader capabilities — so this guide focuses on the three categories that represent where the market is heading rather than where it's been.

Here's what most framework guides miss: the framework itself is typically only about 20% of the work involved in shipping a real app. The other 80% is production infrastructure — payment processing, user authentication, database management, hosting, and App Store submission. We'll use that term throughout this guide because it's the package of capabilities that separates a working demo from a working business. A framework comparison that ignores production infrastructure is like reviewing cars based on engine specs without mentioning that some come without wheels.

The framework landscape has also changed dramatically in the past two years. AI-powered options have gone from novelty experiments to production-ready platforms with real users generating real revenue, which means the traditional framework comparison — Swift vs. React Native vs. Flutter — now leaves out the fastest-growing category entirely.

Native Frameworks: Maximum Control, Maximum Cost

Native development means building your app using the tools and languages each platform was designed for. For iOS, that's Swift with SwiftUI or UIKit. For Android, it's Kotlin with Jetpack Compose or the older XML-based layouts. These are the frameworks Apple and Google built for their own platforms, and they offer the deepest integration with device hardware and operating system features.

The appeal is real. Native apps tend to run faster, feel smoother, and have access to every device capability the moment it's released. If you're building a graphically intensive game, an augmented reality experience, or an app that needs deep integration with device sensors, native development gives you the most control.

But that control comes at a steep cost — and not just financial.

Building natively means maintaining two completely separate codebases. Your iOS app and your Android app share nothing. Every feature gets built twice, every bug gets fixed twice, and every update ships twice. For a development agency, that typically means $40,000 to $80,000 or more for a straightforward business app, and the timeline stretches from three to six months before anything reaches the App Store.

The skill requirement is equally significant. Native development demands actual programming expertise. You need to understand Swift or Kotlin, the platform-specific design patterns, the build tooling (Xcode for iOS, Android Studio for Android), and the submission processes for each app store. There's no shortcut around this — either you're a developer, or you hire one.

• When native makes sense: Performance-critical applications like games or AR experiences, apps requiring deep hardware access (advanced camera, Bluetooth, HealthKit), large teams with dedicated iOS and Android developers, and enterprise apps with strict performance or compliance requirements.
• When native is overkill: Most business apps, SaaS tools, content platforms, marketplaces, service booking apps, and internal tools don't need the performance ceiling native development provides. If your app's core value is connecting users, processing payments, or displaying information — which describes most revenue-generating apps — the performance difference between native and other approaches is invisible to your customers.

The maintenance math deserves particular attention. Two codebases means double the ongoing cost. When Apple releases a new iOS version, you update one app. When Google changes Android permissions, you update the other. A single bug fix can take twice as long because you're implementing and testing it in two different environments. For a solo founder or small team, that's a significant ongoing tax on your time and budget.

Cross-Platform Frameworks: One Codebase, Some Tradeoffs

Cross-platform frameworks solve the biggest pain of native development: building everything twice. You write your app once and deploy it to both iOS and Android from a single codebase. In some cases, you can target web browsers too. That sounds like an obvious win, and for many developers, it is — but the tradeoffs matter depending on what you're building and how technical you are.

React Native

React Native is the most established cross-platform framework, built by Meta and used in production by companies like Shopify, Discord, and Coinbase. If you know JavaScript — the most widely-known programming language — React Native lets you build mobile apps with familiar syntax and tools.

The ecosystem is its biggest strength. There are thousands of community packages for everything from navigation to maps to camera access, and the talent pool is large. Finding a React Native developer is significantly easier than finding a Flutter developer, which matters if you're hiring.

React Native uses a bridge to communicate between JavaScript and native components, which means performance is very good but not quite native-level for graphically intensive tasks. For business apps, SaaS tools, and content-driven products — the kind of apps most builders are creating — you won't notice the difference.

The catch: React Native gives you the UI layer and the framework for structuring your app. It doesn't give you production infrastructure. You'll need to set up Supabase or Firebase for your backend, integrate Stripe or RevenueCat for payments, configure authentication providers, find a hosting solution, and handle App Store submission yourself. Each of those is a project within the project.

Flutter

Flutter is Google's cross-platform framework, and it's been gaining ground rapidly since its stable release. It uses Dart (a language Google developed), which means there's a learning curve if you're coming from JavaScript or Python, but developers who adopt it tend to become strong advocates.

Flutter's standout feature is visual consistency. Because it renders everything through its own engine rather than using native UI components, your app looks identical on iOS and Android. That's valuable if brand consistency matters to you, and it means fewer platform-specific visual bugs to chase down.

The tradeoff is a smaller ecosystem compared to React Native. The package library is growing quickly, but you'll occasionally find that a specific integration you need doesn't exist yet or isn't well-maintained. The Dart talent pool is also smaller, which can make hiring more challenging and expensive.

Like React Native, Flutter handles the UI and app logic but leaves production infrastructure to you.

Kotlin Multiplatform and .NET MAUI

Two other options worth knowing about, though they serve more specific audiences.

Kotlin Multiplatform (KMP) lets you share business logic between iOS and Android while keeping native UIs. It's ideal for teams already deep in the Kotlin ecosystem — typically Android shops that want to share backend logic with iOS without rewriting everything. The approach is powerful but more technical than React Native or Flutter, and adoption is still growing.

.NET MAUI is Microsoft's cross-platform framework for teams already invested in the .NET ecosystem. It's a solid choice if your organization runs on C# and .NET, but the mobile-specific community and resources are smaller than React Native or Flutter's, which means more problem-solving on your own.

The Honest Assessment

Cross-platform frameworks genuinely save development time by eliminating the "build everything twice" problem. For developers and technical teams, they're often the pragmatic choice — one codebase, one team, reasonable performance for most use cases.

But here's what the framework comparison doesn't tell you: the framework is the easy part. The hard part — the part where most projects stall or die — is production infrastructure. Setting up Stripe so your app can actually accept money. Configuring Google login so users don't bounce at the sign-up screen. Managing a database that syncs across devices. Getting your app through Apple's review process without rejection.

Cross-platform frameworks don't solve any of those problems. They give you a faster way to build the app itself, but the production infrastructure remains entirely your responsibility. And for non-technical builders, that gap is often the wall they can't get past — regardless of which framework they chose.

AI-Powered App Builders: Describe It, Ship It

AI-powered app builders represent a fundamentally different approach to the framework question. Instead of choosing a framework, learning a programming language, and assembling production infrastructure piece by piece, you describe what you want your app to do and the platform handles everything underneath.

The framework becomes invisible. You're not choosing between React Native and Flutter because the platform makes that decision for you (or abstracts it away entirely). Your job shifts from building the technical system to defining what the app should do and who it's for — which, for most builders, is where their actual expertise lives.

This category has matured rapidly. Two years ago, AI app builders could produce rough prototypes that looked impressive in demos but fell apart under real usage. Today, the best platforms in this space are shipping production-ready applications — apps in the App Store with real users and real revenue.

But the category isn't monolithic. There are significant differences between platforms, and those differences determine whether you end up with a working business or just another prototype that never launches.

Anything

Anything is built around a specific premise: your app should make money, not just look good in a demo. That production-first focus shows up in what's included out of the box.

The platform builds both mobile and web apps from the same project with a shared backend — you describe your app in plain English, and Anything generates a complete, working application. The full production infrastructure stack is built in and configured automatically: Stripe payments, user authentication (including Google login), databases, hosting, and cloud-signed App Store submission. You don't set up Supabase, you don't manage Firebase, and you don't wrestle with Xcode certificates.

Anything Max, the platform's autonomous agent mode, functions as an AI software engineer that tests your app in a real browser, identifies issues, and fixes them without your input. It handles vague prompts like "it's broken, please fix" and works through complex debugging chains that would take a human developer hours. The platform also uses a custom-trained design model that produces apps with professional, human-looking interfaces — a meaningful distinction when most AI-generated apps have a recognizable "made by AI" aesthetic.

The results speak in revenue. A finance professional in Japan generated $34,000 from AI finance tools built on the platform. A medical student earns $85/month per user from a CPR training app. A marketer made $20,000 from an AI-powered referral tool. These aren't prototypes sitting in a portfolio — they're live businesses with paying customers.

The platform handles projects scaling to 100,000+ lines of code with automatic refactoring, runs on enterprise-grade Postgres/Neon infrastructure, and includes 50+ integrations spanning AI models (GPT, Claude, Gemini), business services, and development tools.

Best for: Non-technical builders, solopreneurs, tech-adjacent professionals, and agencies who want production-ready apps with built-in business infrastructure. Also increasingly used by developers who want to ship faster by automating infrastructure setup.

Bolt

Bolt takes a more developer-oriented approach. Built by StackBlitz, it provides a full-stack development environment in the browser with AI assistance. The tech stack support is strong, and experienced developers can work productively within it.

The tradeoff is that Bolt requires external services for key infrastructure. You'll need to set up Supabase or a similar backend for your database, configure authentication separately, and handle payment integration yourself. It's a powerful tool for developers, but the infrastructure assembly is still on you.

Best for: Experienced developers who want AI acceleration within a familiar development workflow and are comfortable configuring their own backend services.

Lovable

Lovable focuses on prototyping and is moving toward enterprise use cases. The platform produces stylized UIs and integrates well with GitHub, which makes it popular with designers and marketers who want to visualize ideas quickly.

The platform relies on third-party services for production infrastructure, which means the focus is more on getting to a working prototype than on getting to a revenue-generating product.

Best for: Designers and product teams who need rapid prototyping with polished visuals, and enterprise teams exploring internal tool concepts.

v0

v0, built by Vercel, is design-centric and primarily focused on front-end generation. It produces polished UI components using React and Tailwind CSS, and the output quality for visual elements is high.

The limitation is scope. v0 is primarily a UI generation tool — you'll need third-party services for backend logic, databases, and production infrastructure. It's excellent for the visual layer but doesn't get you to a launched product on its own.

Best for: Developers and designers who need high-quality front-end components and are comfortable building the backend separately.

Replit

Replit offers a full cloud development environment with built-in databases, authentication, and AI assistance. It has a massive user base and a collaborative approach that makes it popular for learning and experimentation.

The key distinction: Replit is still fundamentally a coding environment. The AI assists you, but you're writing and editing code. For technical users, that's a feature — you maintain full control. For non-technical builders, it means a steeper learning curve than platforms where you describe what you want in plain English.

Best for: Developers and technical learners who want a full cloud IDE with AI assistance and built-in infrastructure basics.

The Key Distinction

The most important difference across this category isn't which AI model generates better code. It's where each platform stops.

Most AI app builders get you to a prototype — a working demo that looks impressive on screen. The production gap is everything between that demo and a live app with real customers, real payments, and real uptime.

That gap is where projects die. It's the "doom loop" that builders describe — the app works in the demo, breaks when you add authentication, and you're stuck debugging infrastructure at midnight with no clear path forward.

Platforms that include production infrastructure eliminate that gap. Platforms that rely on external services leave it for you to bridge, which can be straightforward for experienced developers and near-impossible for everyone else.

How to Actually Choose: Five Questions That Matter More Than Benchmarks

Framework comparison tables are easy to find. What's harder to find is a practical decision framework that accounts for your actual situation — your skills, your budget, your timeline, and whether you want to build a business or demonstrate a concept.

These five questions will narrow your options faster than any benchmark comparison.

1. Does it get you to production — with infrastructure included?

This is the question most framework guides skip entirely, and it's the most important one.

A prototype proves your idea works. Production proves people will pay for it. The difference between the two is production infrastructure: payment processing that actually collects money, authentication that works the first time a user logs in, a database that doesn't lose data, hosting that stays online, and an App Store listing that passes Apple's review.

If you choose a framework or platform that includes all of that, you can focus on your product and your customers. If you choose one that only handles code generation, you're signing up for weeks of wiring up Stripe, configuring OAuth providers, setting up Supabase or Firebase, finding hosting, and navigating App Store certificates — each one a mini-project with its own documentation and gotchas.

Native frameworks get you to production, but the timeline is long, the cost is high, and you're assembling every piece of infrastructure yourself. Cross-platform frameworks get you to production if you have the technical skills to set up the infrastructure on your own. AI-powered platforms vary dramatically — some stop at prototype, while Anything includes the full production infrastructure stack through App Store submission.

For experienced developers, wiring up infrastructure is familiar work. For everyone else, it's typically where the project stalls.

2. Does it handle mobile and web from the same project?

Most businesses need both a mobile app and a web presence. Your customers expect to find you in the App Store and at a URL they can bookmark. Building and maintaining two separate projects doubles your cost and complexity.

Native: No. iOS and Android are separate codebases. Web requires a third project. Cross-platform: Partially. React Native and Flutter handle iOS and Android from one codebase. Web support exists but varies in maturity. AI-powered: Varies by platform. Anything builds mobile and web apps from the same project with a shared backend, which means your data, authentication, and business logic are consistent across both.

This matters more than most builders realize upfront. When you update a feature, change a price, or fix a bug, doing it once in one place versus two or three times across separate projects is the difference between iterating in hours and iterating in weeks.

3. How fast can you launch — and how fast can you iterate after launch?

Speed matters twice: once at launch and continuously after it.

Every week between your idea and your first paying customer is a week of spending without learning. You're burning savings, consuming runway, or draining motivation without the feedback that only comes from someone actually paying for your product. But speed at launch is only half the equation — every customer complaint, feature request, and market shift after launch requires changes too. The builders who win aren't the ones with the best launch. They're the ones who respond to customer feedback fastest.

Native development: Three to six months to launch with an agency, potentially longer solo. Every post-launch update requires a developer, testing across platforms, and resubmission. Iteration cycles measured in days to weeks.

Cross-platform frameworks: Weeks to months to launch, depending on team size and infrastructure setup time. Updates still require developer involvement, but you're maintaining one codebase instead of two. Iteration cycles measured in days.

AI-powered platforms: Days to weeks to launch. Anything users have gone from idea to App Store in under two months. William Sayer, a professional mountaineer with no development background, built his TakeawaysApp and launched it on the App Store in two months. Dirk Minnebo, a go-to-market consultant, had his first version live within days of starting. Post-launch, you describe changes in plain English — "add a settings page" or "change the subscription price to $12/month" — and ship updates the same day. Iteration cycles measured in hours.

The math compounds: if Framework A takes six months to launch and iterates in weeks, while Framework B launches in two weeks and iterates in hours, the gap in customer feedback, revenue, and product improvement grows every single day.

4. Do you own the code — and can you leave?

This question matters most to developers and technical founders, but every builder should consider it.

Frameworks and platforms sit on a spectrum from full ownership to full dependence. At one end, you own every line of code and can host it anywhere. At the other, your app only exists inside the platform that built it. Most options fall somewhere in between.

Native frameworks give you complete code ownership. You can host anywhere, switch providers, and modify anything. The tradeoff is that you're responsible for everything, forever.

Cross-platform frameworks also give you full ownership. Your React Native or Flutter codebase is yours to deploy however you choose. The external services you connect (Supabase, Firebase, Stripe) each have their own portability considerations, but the core app is yours.

AI-powered platforms vary significantly here. Some generate code you can export and continue developing independently. Anything supports GitHub Sync and full code export, which means you can take your codebase to your own hosting if you outgrow the platform or need to meet specific compliance requirements. Other AI builders are more opaque about what's happening under the hood, and some don't offer export at all.

If you're building a business you plan to run for years, knowing your exit options matters — even if you never use them.

5. Will the output look professional enough for paying customers?

Your app's design is the first thing users judge, and it determines whether they trust it enough to create an account or enter payment information. An app that looks obviously machine-generated or template-driven undermines the credibility of the business behind it.

Native frameworks give you full design control — but you need a designer or strong design skills to use it well. A poorly designed native app looks just as bad as a poorly designed app built any other way.

Cross-platform frameworks provide solid design primitives. Flutter's rendering engine produces visually consistent results across platforms. React Native uses native UI components, which look platform-appropriate by default. In both cases, the design quality depends on whoever is building — the framework doesn't make design decisions for you.

AI-powered platforms differ dramatically on design output. Most produce apps with a recognizable "made by AI" look — generic layouts, default styling, and limited visual personality. Anything uses a custom-trained design model that produces professional, human-looking interfaces, which is a meaningful differentiator when your customers need to trust the app enough to pay for it. Other platforms in the category tend to produce functional but visually generic output that requires significant manual refinement.

For solopreneurs and agencies especially, the gap between "works but looks AI-generated" and "looks like a designer built it" can be the difference between a customer signing up or bouncing.

Framework Comparison at a Glance

Here's the practical comparison across the criteria that actually affect your outcome.

<table style="width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:1.5;">

<thead>

<tr style="background-color:#2B2B2B; color:#FFFFFF;">

<th style="padding:10px 14px; text-align:left; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;"></th>

<th style="padding:10px 14px; text-align:left; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Native (Swift/Kotlin)</th>

<th style="padding:10px 14px; text-align:left; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Cross-Platform (React Native/Flutter)</th>

<th style="padding:10px 14px; text-align:left; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">AI-Powered (Anything)</th>

</tr>

</thead>

<tbody>

<tr style="background-color:#F5F5F5;">

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC; font-weight:bold;">Skill Required</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Professional developer</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Intermediate to advanced developer</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">No coding required</td>

</tr>

<tr>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC; font-weight:bold;">Time to App Store</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">3–6+ months</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">1–3 months</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Days to weeks</td>

</tr>

<tr style="background-color:#F5F5F5;">

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC; font-weight:bold;">Dev Cost</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">$40K–$80K+ (agency) or full-time dev salary</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">$15K–$50K (agency) or developer time</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">$19–$200/month subscription</td>

</tr>

<tr>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC; font-weight:bold;">Production Infrastructure</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Manual setup for every component</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Manual setup for every component</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Built in — payments, auth, DB, hosting, App Store</td>

</tr>

<tr style="background-color:#F5F5F5;">

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC; font-weight:bold;">Mobile + Web</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Separate codebases</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Mobile from one codebase; web varies</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Both from same project, shared backend</td>

</tr>

<tr>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC; font-weight:bold;">Iteration Speed</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Days to weeks per update (developer required)</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Days per update (developer required)</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Hours — describe changes in plain English</td>

</tr>

<tr style="background-color:#F5F5F5;">

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC; font-weight:bold;">Code Ownership</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Full ownership, host anywhere</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Full ownership, host anywhere</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">GitHub Sync + full code export</td>

</tr>

<tr>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC; font-weight:bold;">Design Quality</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Full control (requires designer skill)</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Framework defaults (requires designer skill)</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Custom-trained model — professional, human-looking output</td>

</tr>

<tr style="background-color:#F5F5F5;">

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC; font-weight:bold;">Maintenance</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">High (two codebases, all infrastructure)</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Moderate (one codebase, external services)</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Low (platform-managed)</td>

</tr>

<tr>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC; font-weight:bold;">Best For</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Performance-critical apps, large dev teams</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Technical founders, dev teams wanting efficiency</td>

<td style="padding:10px 14px; border:1px solid #CCCCCC;">Solopreneurs, agencies, builders focused on revenue</td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table>

If you skipped straight to this table, here's the short version: native gives you maximum control at maximum cost, cross-platform gives you efficiency if you can code, and AI-powered platforms like Anything give you speed to revenue without requiring technical skills.

The Right Choice Depends on You, Not the Framework

The "best" mobile app development framework doesn't exist in the abstract. It exists relative to your skills, your budget, your timeline, and what you're actually trying to accomplish.

• If you're a developer with time and specific performance requirements — native or cross-platform. You'll get the control you want, full code ownership, and the flexibility to customize everything. Native for apps where every millisecond of performance matters. Cross-platform for shipping to both platforms faster without sacrificing meaningful quality.
• If you're a developer who wants to ship faster and focus on business logic — cross-platform or AI-powered. React Native and Flutter handle the multi-platform problem. AI-powered platforms like Anything go further by eliminating infrastructure setup entirely — and with GitHub Sync and code export, you're not sacrificing ownership for speed.
• If you're a non-technical builder who wants to make money from an app — AI-powered with built-in production infrastructure. The framework matters less than whether the platform gets you from idea to paying customer without requiring you to become a developer along the way. That means production infrastructure included, professional design output, and the ability to iterate in plain English — not a prototype you can't deploy.

The framework debate is real for developers choosing technical tools. For builders choosing how to bring a product to market, the question has shifted. It's no longer "which framework should I learn?" It's "which platform gets me to my first paying customer fastest — with an app that actually works, looks professional, and keeps running when real users show up?"

Pick one of the five questions from the section above, answer it honestly about your own situation, and the right category becomes clear. Then build. Get started with Anything.